Visual Representations of Silent Atherosclerosis

Adherence to both pharmacologic treatment and lifestyle modification were better after patients received visual reports.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease often fails because of poor adherence to evidence-based guidelines by both patients and clinicians. Might visual representations of patients’ existing atherosclerosis increase adherence to preventive guidelines?

Researchers randomized 3532 participants (age, >60; or age, >40 with ≥1 conventional CV risk factor) in a Swedish population-based CV prevention program to undergo carotid ultrasound examinations and to either receive or not receive a visual report of the results. Each patient’s report displayed a stylized representation of the ultrasound image and a gauge that compared vascular age with chronological age. Patients who received visual reports also received reinforcing phone calls from a nurse and copies of their reports 6 months later; their clinicians also received copies of their visual reports. Patients who did not receive visual reports received standard guideline-based preventive care.

After 1 year, mean Framingham Risk Score decreased from 12.9 to 12.2 in patients who received visual reports and increased from 12.9 to 13.3 among controls (a statistically significant between-groups difference). A similar pattern was noted for the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation score. The effect of the intervention was greatest among patients with the highest baseline CV risk.


Secondary outcome data suggested that the visual reports led to improvements in both pharmacologic treatment and lifestyle modification, implicating both provider and patient behaviors. Longer-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness data will be published later. Carotid imaging is relatively inexpensive and accessible, but given the incentives for overtreatment in the U.S., widespread carotid imaging might encourage unnecessary and potentially harmful downstream procedures.


Source: Lancet

Inflammatory Cytokines in Atherosclerosis: Current Therapeutic Approaches


The notion of atherosclerosis as a chronic inflammatory disease has intensified research on the role of cytokines and the way these molecules act and interact to initiate and sustain inflammation in the microenvironment of an atherosclerotic plaque. Cytokines are expressed by all types of cells involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, act on a variety of targets exerting multiple effects, and are largely responsible for the crosstalk among endothelial, smooth muscle cells, leucocytes, and other vascular residing cells. It is now understood that widely used drugs such as statins, aspirin, methotrexate, and colchicine act in an immunomodulatory way that may beneficially affect atherogenesis and/or cardiovascular disease progression. Moreover, advancement in pharmaceutical design has enabled the production of highly specific antibodies against key molecules involved in the perpetuation of the inflammatory cascade, raising hope for advances in the treatment of atherosclerosis. This review describes the actions and effects of these agents, their potential clinical significance, and future prospects.


Atherosclerosis is considered to be a chronic inflammatory disease[1] and scientific interest has focussed on the role of cytokines as possible therapeutic agents for atherosclerosis, as cytokines are known to orchestrate the complex inflammatory response within the atherosclerotic plaque. Indeed, cytokines are produced by and act (often synergistically) on almost all cells involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, participating in all steps of the process, from the early endothelial dysfunction to the late formation and disruption of a vulnerable plaque.[2]

Throughout the years multiple therapeutic approaches in the cardiovascular field, i.e. statins and anti-hypertensive agents, have shown their ability to modify immunological and inflammatory responses in parallel to their principal effects as cholesterol-lowering agents or blood pressure reduction.[3]Moreover, novel agents directed against specific targets in the inflammatory cascade are now also being applied in clinical settings.[4] Interest in this novel therapeutic field is expanding rapidly, as demonstrated by the large number of ongoing clinical trials involving this kind of agents. As our knowledge regarding the role of cytokines in atherogenesis expands, newer approaches come to light and many show promising results in the fight against atherosclerosis. The goal of this review is to describe the actions and effects of anti-inflammatory agents, highlight available data on their clinical significance, and provide further insight regarding their future prospects.

Cytokines and Atherosclerosis

In the context of atherosclerosis, cytokines can be classified broadly as pro- or anti-atherogenic, depending on their effects on the formation and progression of the atherosclerotic plaque (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Pro- and anti-atherogenic cytokines. Cytokines can be divided into two groups depending on whether they promote or suppress atherogenesis. Notably, there are also cytokines such as interleukin-2 and interleukin-17 whose exact role in atherogenesis has not been fully elucidated. GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN-α,β,γ, interferon-α, -β, and -γ; IL, interleukin (e.g. IL-1β, interleukin-1β); MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α.

Pro-atherogenic Cytokines

Pro-atherogenic cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6 are secreted by macrophages, lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells.[2] Tumour necrosis factor-α and IL-1 signalling is mainly mediated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK)/nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of the activated B-cell (NF-κ) pathway,[5] and this affects almost all cells involved in atherogenesis by promoting the expression of cytokines, adhesion molecules, and the migration and mitogenesis of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells.[2]

The actions of pro-atherogenic cytokines can be better appreciated based on experimental studies with hyperlipidaemic mouse models. For example, TNF-α−/−, apolipoprotein E (ApoE)−/− double knockout mice showed decreased atherogenesis, endothelial adhesiveness, and inflammatory markers when compared with controls.[6] Similar conclusions were drawn when ApoE−/− mice were treated with a recombinant soluble TNF-αp55 receptor that acted as decoy to inhibit TNF-α activity.[7] In humans, TNF-α promotes the interaction between circulating leucocytes and the endothelium through up-regulation of adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1).[8]

Interleukin-6 actions on the other hand are mediated by the IL-6 receptor and a signal transducing protein called gp130, which result in activation of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and 3.[9] In studies with ApoE-deficient mice, recombinant IL-6 injections exacerbated the progression of atherosclerosis.[10] Clinical studies have further revealed that IL-6 serum levels are increased in unstable angina patients and are considered an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD).[2,11]

Anti-atherogenic Cytokines

Contrary to TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6, several other cytokines appear to act in a protective manner against the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. For example, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is closely associated with T-regulatory (Treg) cells, a distinct subset of T lymphocytes with known immunomodulatory activity. It is known that part of the immunomodulatory activity of Treg cells is mediated by the secretion of anti-inflammatory and atheroprotective cytokines including TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-35.[12] As far as IL-10 is concerned, it appears to possess multiple anti-atherogenic activities including but not limited to down-regulation of TNF-α production[13] and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression on endothelial cells.[14]

Even though a detailed presentation of the role of all cytokines goes beyond the scope of this review, it is crucial to keep in mind that cytokine actions are extremely complex. This issue represents an enormous challenge when developing and testing novel cytokine-related treatments, a problem that will become more evident as we discuss the potential risks and benefits of newer therapeutic approaches.

The Emerging Role of Cytokine-related Treatment

Established Clinical Approaches in Humans

The first steps towards the development of anti-inflammatory treatments in atherosclerosis were accomplished while studying patients with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, such as psoriasis or rheumatoid arthritis. It has long been known that these conditions are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis similar to that of diabetes mellitus[15] and a more severe presentation of adverse cardiovascular events.[16,17] In addition, treatment with methotrexate or biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis protects against atherosclerosis,[18] whereas anti-TNF-α therapy is also associated with a reduced risk for all cardiovascular events.[19]

In general, anti-inflammatory approaches in atherosclerosis can be divided into two major categories. The first includes conventional drugs with broad-based anti-inflammatory properties such as statins, aspirin, methotrexate, and colchicine, which can additionally affect the inflammatory cascade. The second group includes anti-inflammatory drugs designed to inhibit specific mediators and cytokines in the inflammatory pathway (Table 1 and Figure 2). Several ongoing and completed clinical trials testing the effects of these interventions in humans are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Cytokine-related therapeutic approaches in atherosclerosis. In the context of atherosclerosis, several methods have been studied to modify the inflammatory cascade. 1. Broad-based immunomodulatory agents. 2. Blockade of pro-inflammatory cytokines. 3. Delivery of anti-inflammatory cytokines with adenovirus vectors or liposomes. 4. Induction of regulatory T cells. 5. In vivo transfection with oligonucleotides. IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell.

Statins. Statins are traditionally known for their hypolipidaemic effects but have also been shown to act in an immunomodulatory manner. This is believed to be due to decreased production of isoprenoid intermediates that are responsible for the post-translational modification of small GTPases. In other words, statins are able to modify intracellular inflammatory pathways.[3]

Indeed, several statins have been shown to antagonize the effects of inflammatory cytokines (Figure 3). For example, simvastatin appears to neutralize the pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic actions of TNF-α through inhibition of the TNF-α-induced expression of VCAM-1 and suppression of thrombomodulin and endothelial nitric oxide synthase.[20] Atorvastatin improves vascular nitric oxide bioavailability and decreases the post-glucose loading levels of TNF-α.[21] In addition, statins have been shown to affect the production of cytokines by leucocytes[43] down-regulating the production of pro-inflammatory IL-1 and up-regulating the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.[44,45] Interestingly, recent studies have shown that the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with statin treatment is independent from the reduction in LDL cholesterol levels.[46]

Examples of cytokine-related statin effects in the microenvironment of an atherosclerotic plaque. Statins have been shown to antagonize the effects of inflammatory cytokines. For example, simvastatin neutralizes the pro-atherogenic actions of tumour necrosis factor-α through inhibition of the tumour necrosis factor-α-induced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and suppression of thrombomodulin, whereas atorvastatin improves vascular nitric oxide bioavailability. Simvastatin can potently down-regulate the production of known pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 while also up-regulating the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10. Finally, simvastatin is also able to counteract the combined pro-proliferative effects of tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-18 on aortic smooth muscle cells. IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell.

It is therefore generally accepted that statins exert pleiotropic actions and affect a variety of parameters associated with atherosclerosis. Early administration of low-dose atorvastatin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (SEMI) can even improve the clinical outcome by down-regulating endothelial activation and inflammation.[47] Recently, the PRATO-ACS (Protective Effect of Rosuvastatin and Antiplatelet Therapy on Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Myocardial Damage in ACS Patients) has reported the beneficial effects of rosuvastatin in contrast-induced nephropathy caused in subjects with ST elevation myocardial infraction.[48] Since inflammation promotes endothelial dysfunction and vulnerability of kidney vessels, this action may be mediated by anti-inflammatory effects of statins, as it was recently proposed.[49]

In regard to clinical applicability, several studies have revealed that an inflammatory-based treatment approach may be useful. In the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS), a 5-year randomized trial that included 5742 subjects without CAD, it was shown that lovastatin prevented ACS especially in the high CRP group despite a favourable lipid profile. Indeed, lovastatin reduced CRP levels by 15%, and it was effective to reduce cardiovascular events even in patients with favourable lipid profile at baseline but with increased CRP levels. Importantly, it was found that the number needed to treat to prevent one event in this category of patients with CRP levels >0.16 mg/dL was 48.[50] In line with this evidence, the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)—one of the most important large-scale randomized control studies, which included 17 802 apparently healthy individuals randomized to either rosuvastatin 20 mg/day or placebo with follow-up for a median of 1.9 years—demonstrated that in subjects with CRP levels >2 mg/L, even with low LDL cholesterol levels, rosuvastatin treatment can decrease adverse cardiovascular events.[51] Notably, the greatest benefit is observed in patients in whom rosuvastatin treatment decreases not only LDL levels <70 mg/dL but also CRP levels <1 mg/L (79% reduction in the event rate compared with subjects in the placebo arm or 0.24 events per 100 persons compared with 1.11 events per 100 persons, respectively).[52] This is in accordance with several studies which show that the beneficial effects of statins cannot and should not be solely attributed to their lipid-lowering effects but are also related to their ability to dampen inflammation or improve endothelial[53] and arterial wall function[54] through lipid-independent mechanisms.[3]

Aspirin. Aspirin inhibits cyclooxygenase irreversibly and suppresses the production of prostaglandins and thromboxanes.[55] Therefore, it acts not only as an antiplatelet agent but also as an anti-inflammatory one. In murine models of atherosclerosis, low-dose aspirin improves vascular inflammation and plaque stability.[56] Recent data in ApoE-deficient mice support the hypothesis that aspirin can also reduce fractalkine levels (fractalkine acts both as a chemokine and as an adhesion molecule) and improve the severity of atherosclerotic lesions.[57] Recently, it was also documented in humans that low-dose aspirin treatment reduces chemerin (a peptide chemoattractant for macrophages and an adipokine-regulating adipocyte differentiation and metabolism) secretion by adipocytes through reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion by macrophages.[58] Aspirin further protects human endothelial function in the presence of inflammation[59] and decreases the plasma levels of several inflammatory cytokines and markers such as IL-6, CRP, and monocyte colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) in patients with stable angina.[60] Interestingly, the use of aspirin as a primary prevention therapy is associated with a reduction in the development of myocardial infarction, which appears to be directly related to CRP levels, raising the possibility that the anti-inflammatory properties of aspirin may be as important as its anti-thrombotic effects.[61] Moreover, in primary prevention, aspirin can improve arterial stiffness even after 2 weeks of low dose (160 mg/day).[62] However, we have to notice that the exact anti-atherosclerotic effect of aspirin cannot be determined as reports support the notion that aspirin can reduce hypertriglyceridaemia, cholesterol, and free fatty acid production[63] but also increases lipid peroxidation.[64] Indeed, the exact benefit of aspirin in chronic CAD has recently been questioned by the results of the CONFIRM study (Coronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN for Clinical Outcomes study). In this multicentre international registry, 5712 individuals with normal coronary arteries and 4706 individuals with non-obstructive CAD were followed up for a median of 27.2 months, and aspirin use, contrary to statins, was not associated with mortality benefit in patients with non-obstructive CAD irrespective of the status of the plaque.[65] Similarly, data from the prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial have shown that even in patients with diabetes mellitus and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease aspirin did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events.[66] Moreover, in 1884 recipients of low-dose aspirin with chronic kidney disease paired with 1884 non-recipients, the incidence of atherosclerotic events was significantly higher in the aspirin users.[67] It would be interesting to study the effects of aspirin in groups with elevated vs. low levels of circulating inflammatory markers.
Methotrexate. Methotrexate is an antimetabolite drug that acts by inhibiting the metabolism of folic acid. Its anti-inflammatory actions, however, may also be attributed to an increase in adenosine levels.[68] In fact, methotrexate treatment reduces the size of experimentally induced myocardial infarction probably via adenosine release which not only reduces inflammation but also improves coronary flow in the culprit lesion.[69] In addition, previous studies have shown that methotrexate can further modulate the expression of ICAM-1, E-selectin, VCAM-1,[22] and IL-6.[23]

Interestingly, studies have proved that low-dose methotrexate can decrease the cardiovascular risk of patients with chronic inflammatory disease. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, methotrexate may provide a substantial survival benefit, largely by reducing cardiovascular mortality.[40] Similar results were also described by van Halm et al. in a case–control study.[70] However, some studies did not confirm the protective role of methotrexate in the incidence of cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients.[71] Therefore, further studies have now been designed to test this hypothesis. For example, the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) aims to enrol 7000 individual to test the role of methotrexate in the medical management of stable CAD patients with persistent elevation of high-sensitivity CRP,[72] while the TETHYS trial aims to evaluate its value in reducing infarct size when administered within the first 6 h of admission for ST-elevation myocardial infraction.[73] Furthermore, a recently announced CIRT sub-study aims to evaluate the effects of methotrexate in arterial inflammation (as seen on PET-CT scanning) in patients with prior MI or multi-vessel CAD (NCT02576067). It is difficult, however, to definitely conclude that the beneficial effect of methotrexate in cardiovascular incidence is solely due to its anti-inflammatory properties. Studies have recently documented that methotrexate modifies lipid levels increasing both HDL and LDL cholesterol and affects macrophage cholesterol handling opposing foam cell formation.[74]

Colchicine. Evidence for the ability of colchicine to modify cytokine levels is based on patients with familiar Mediterranean fever. In this condition, modification of the inflammatory cascade with colchicine not only reduces symptoms of the disease but also decreases the risk for ischaemic heart disease.[75] In addition, a retrospective cross-sectional study concluded that long-term treatment of gout with low-dose colchicine decreased not only CRP levels but also the incidence of myocardial infraction.[76] Furthermore, Nidorf and Thompson showed that colchicine, in addition to aspirin and high-dose atorvastatin treatment, can significantly lower high-sensitivity CRP in patients with stable CAD.[24] Finally, in the Low-Dose Colchicine (LoDoCo) trial—a prospective, randomized, observer blinded endpoint design study of 532 subject—addition of colchicine 0.5 mg/day to aspirin and/or clopidogrel and statins in CAD patients resulted in lower incidence (5.3%) of acute coronary syndrome, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, or non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke vs. the placebo group (16%).[39] Currently, several ongoing trials aim to evaluate the potential benefit of colchicine in improving cardiovascular indices and prognosis in patients with CAD as summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Corticosteroids. A few reports that examined intermediate atherosclerotic markers such as arterial stiffness as assessed by pulse wave velocity have shown that the use of corticosteroids can act beneficially in some chronic inflammatory disorders such as polymyalgia rheumatic.[77] However, corticosteroids in the setting of acute myocardial infarction have failed to demonstrate significant mortality benefit, as shown in one meta-analysis of randomized control trials.[41] In addition, long-term use of corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis patients is associated with a significantly higher incidence of acute myocardial infarction.[78]

Specific Target-based Anti-inflammatory Treatment

Blockade of Pro-inflammatory and Delivery of Anti-inflammatory Cytokines. As described in the previous section, the prophylactic effect of broad-based anti-inflammatory treatments is currently limited to statins and aspirin. Nevertheless, especially for aspirin, its value in primary prevention is equivocal while for methotrexate, colchicine, and corticosteroids results are not definitive. Therefore, several novel strategies have been developed to more specifically antagonize the actions of pro-inflammatory cytokines, the most important being the administration of soluble decoy receptors, direct receptor antagonists (e.g. endogenous IL-1Ra), and monoclonal antibodies (Table 4).

Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor-α Treatment: Several anti-TNF agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab) have been introduced recently against inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.[85]

Interestingly, spare pre-clinical data have shown that anti-TNF treatment can favourably affect atherosclerosis. Recently, in a model that reproduced in vivo interactions between leucocytes and endothelial cells, anti-TNF treatment diminished leucocyte-endothelial interactions induced by inflammatory stimuli.[86] It is currently known that treatment with anti-TNF agents can improve endothelial function and arterial wall properties in patients with autoimmune diseases, such as psoriasis.[27] Moreover, it has been reported that inhibition of TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis can increase circulating endothelial progenitor cells concurrently with a proportional decrease of disease activity[79] and decrease serum asymmetric dimethyl arginine levels.[26]

Clinical studies have revealed that anti-TNF-α therapies in patients with ankylosing spondylitis improve subclinical atherosclerosis and aortic stiffness when compared with placebo controls.[87] A meta-analysis published in 2011 showed that anti-TNF-α treatment in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a lower risk for all cardiovascular events.[19] Nevertheless, we have to take into consideration that studies with these agents in patients with chronic heart failure have failed to improve patient outcome.[88] Unfortunately, there are currently no ongoing trials evaluating the exact health or mortality benefit of anti-TNF-α agents in a large cohort of healthy or CAD patients and studies so far have been limited to rheumatological patients.

Interleukin-1β Inhibition: Canakinumab is a monoclonal human antibody that binds to human IL-1β, blocking its interaction with its receptor. Interleukin-1β has so far been used in the treatment of rare hereditary IL-1β-driven disorders, such as Muckle–Wells syndrome. Treatment of such cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and rheumatoid arthritis with canakinumab produces a rapid and sustained inhibition of the acute phase response resulting in a substantial reduction in CRP levels.[89,90]

Previously, studies have shown that IL-1-deficient mice show decreased atherosclerosis.[91] Moreover, in an atherosclerotic mouse model, inhibition of IL-1 orients tissue macrophages to an anti-inflammatory phenotype and atherosclerotic lesions are therefore reduced.[92]

Furthermore, canakinumab has been shown to effectively reduce glycated haemoglobin, glucose, CRP, IL-6, and fibrinogen levels in male patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk.[28] However, a definite cardiovascular event or survival benefit has not been demonstrated yet but is currently investigated by the Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS), which focusses on post-myocardial patients with persistent elevation of high-sensitivity CRP.[83]

Another approach used to modify IL-1 activity is by enhancing the activity of IL-1Ra, which in turn negatively regulates IL-1 signalling. For example, anakinra, a human IL-1Ra, can block the biological activity of IL-1 in rheumatoid arthritis patients by competitively inhibiting the binding of IL-1 to the IL-1-type receptor and also reduces IL-6 and endothelin-1 levels with a parallel increase in flow-mediated dilation, coronary flow reserve, and aortic dispensability.[84] In the MRC-ILA-HEART study, subcutaneous IL-1Ra administration for 14 days in non-SEMI (NSTEMI) patients resulted in lower CRP and IL-6 levels at the end of the treatment; however, a higher rate of MACE was observed after the treatment (HR 3.39, 95% CI 1.10–10.4, P = 0.023).[29] The VCU-ART 2 (Virginia Commonwealth University Anakinra Remodeling Trial) study showed that anakinra given for 2 weeks post-STEMI has a neutral effect on recurrent ischaemic events but may lower new heart failure incidence or mortality at 1 year (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.76, P = 0.008),[38] a finding that will be further evaluated by the more recent VCU-ART-3 trial (NCT01950299).

Intereleukin-6 Inhibition: Potential strategies using anti-IL-6 therapies have not been as widely tested as in the case of TNF-α or IL-1. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks both membrane-bound and circulating IL-6 receptor. Randomized trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have shown that tocilizumab increases total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels.[93] Moreover, it results in improved endothelial function and decreased aortic stiffness.[30] Currently, several ongoing studies investigate the role of tocilizumabin in NSEMI (NCT01491074, Phase 2 trial) and in comparison to etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular risk factors (NCT01331837, Phase 4 trial).

Anti-interleukin-12/23p40 and Anti-interleukin-17 Agents: Monoclonal antibodies that are targeted against the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23 have recently been introduced in the treatment of psoriasis. These cytokines mediate the function of Th17 cells, a distinct subset of T cells that have been identified as a pro-atherogenic group of leucocytes within the atherosclerotic plaque.[94] Despite these pro-atherogenic effects, a recent meta-analysis concluded that treatment with such agents (ustekinumab and briakinumab) may even increase the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events when compared with placebo.[42] Brodalumab (an IL-17 receptor A antagonist), ixekizumab, and secukinumab (IL-17A antagonists), also used in psoriasis, are potential antagonists of atherosclerosis, given the pro-inflammatory nature of IL-17.[95] Interleukin-17 inhibition attenuates atherosclerosis in animals,[96] but clinical studies in humans are not available to date.

Anti-P-selectin Agents: P-selectin, a cell adhesion molecule that organizes endothelial cell and platelet interactions, plays a role in leucocyte activation, formation of thrombi, and neointimal formation. The SELECT ACS study in 544 patients with NSTEMI showed that inclacumab—a recombinant monoclonal antibody against P-selectin—decreases the myocardial damage.[97] However, the SELECT CABG study, a Phase 2 trial, which is planning to test the efficacy of inclacumab in saphenous vein graft disease, has not yet been published.

Targeting Post-ischaemic Reperfusion Injury. Re-establishment of coronary perfusion after an acute ischaemic event causes the so-called reperfusion injury, which is attributed to oxidative stress, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and ultimately diminished mitochondrial ability to produce energy in the form of ATP.[98] Bendavia is an intravenously administered mitochondrial targeting peptide that has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size and attenuate coronary no-reflow in experimental models when given before reperfusion.[99] Therefore, the EMBRACE STEMI study enrolled 300 patients with first anterior STEMI to test whether Bendavia is superior to placebo for the reduction of myocardial infarction size.[100] The first preliminary reports of this study have recently been announced and have shown that Bendavia infusion is safe although it did not achieve a significant reduction in the infarct size. However, future trials are planning to test if higher doses can be beneficial in patients with systolic heart failure (NCT02388464 and NCT02388529).

Experimental Approaches in Animal Models. Future directions concerning the targeted modification of the inflammatory cascade can be derived from experimental models. However, the extrapolation of animal outcomes to human patients is not straightforward as significant differences exist in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis between different species.[101]

Delivery of Anti-inflammatory Cytokines. Delivery of anti-inflammatory cytokines for therapeutic purposes has been attempted in experimental animal models with promising results. It is now possible to locally deliver anti-inflammatory cytokines to specific atherosclerosis sites via adenoviruses. Such is the case of IL-19 which is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the Th2 anti-inflammatory cell phenotype.[31] Furthermore, a recently developed method exploits stealth liposomes that are coupled with IL-10 and act to specifically and reliably transfer the atheroprotective cytokine to the desired site in atherosclerotic plaques.[32] It is obvious that these methods may have unknown risks, and studies on safety and efficacy are warranted before they can be applied in humans.

Targeting Intracellular Signaling: Certain studies have succeeded in limiting atherosclerosis by manipulating intracellular signalling in animal models. For example, an oligonucleotide that acted as a decoy binding site for NF-κB succeeded in preventing intimal hyperplasia following balloon angioplasty.[33] An adenovirus-expressed suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 has also been successful in limiting inflammation though not in a model of atherosclerosis,[102] and similar efforts have been done trying to block JAK3 signalling.[103] However, given the ubiquitous nature of these molecules (especially NF-κ), it is important to guarantee that treatment does not interfere with normal processes in order to minimize adverse effects.

Promoting the Actions of T-regulatory Cells: Administration of anti-CD3 antibodies in mice with progressed atherosclerosis managed to suppress atherogenesis and was linked to up-regulated TGF-β and Foxp3 expression in lymphoid organs.[34,104] In addition, oral calcitriol administration to hyperlipidaemic mice blocked atherosclerosis possibly by inducing the expansion of T-regulatory cells,[105] whereas local delivery of IL-2 suppressed atherogenesis in already existing lesions through the same mechanism.[35]

Unanswered Questions and Future Directions

The immune and inflammatory networks are complex and not fully understood at present, and even though our knowledge regarding the basic mechanisms of action of cytokines in humans is constantly expanding, there are still no absolute data on the benefit of targeted anti-inflammatory therapy in atherosclerosis. Notably, as demonstrated by the MRC-ILA-HEART study[36] and other direct and indirect anti-inflammatory strategies such as with anti-IL-12/23 antibodies,[42] corticosteroids,[41] aspirin[65] and COX-2 inhibitors,[106] targeted and broad-based anti-inflammatory treatments may even lead to an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events in some cases. Indeed, our experience shows that several drugs with promising results in animals fail to demonstrate similar efficacy in humans, such as Bendavia in the recent EMBRACE STEMI trial.[100]

Nevertheless, other studies have shown significant benefit for such anti-inflammatory strategies. Overall, there seems to be a significant gap between our detailed understanding of cytokine actions and the benefit of such targeted interventions. This could be explained by the complex actions of a huge number of cytokines that are involved in atherogenesis as well as by the lack of large-scale clinical trials that can provide reliable data on the efficacy of these strategies.

Therefore, modulation of cytokines poses a therapeutic dilemma and the risks and benefits of inflammation suppression must be weighed before treatment. Particularly in regard to the newer biological agents, observations are limited mostly to rheumatological patients, and small-scale clinical trials and evidence regarding health and survival benefit are lacking in some cases (e.g. TNF inhibitors). Interestingly, there are currently several such clinical trials that are taking place (most notably the CANTOS, CIRT, and Entracte trials) whose results are eagerly awaited and may shape the future of atherosclerosis management and treatment.


Atherosclerosis is considered an inflammatory disease, and the significant role of cytokines in the initiation and maintenance of a pro-inflammatory state is well established. In recent years, novel therapeutic approaches capable of modulating cytokine production or their actions have been tested or are under investigation. Indeed, broad-based immunomodulatory therapies or specific molecules against inflammatory cytokines are now under investigation for the treatment of high-risk atherosclerotic subjects generating new hopes for the future. However, so far, there are no definitive data on the benefit of targeted anti-inflammatory therapy in atherosclerosis and therefore further studies are needed. Hopefully, in the next few years, we are going to have new data that will provide answers and guidance for our next steps in the fight against atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.

Do You Smoke to Cope With Pain? Research Finds Surprising Effect

If you find yourself lighting a cigarette when you’re in pain, you’re not alone. Many people smoke to cope with chronic pain. But here’s the kicker: Research shows that tobacco use overall – both smoking and chewing tobacco – can actually trigger pain. It also can make pain medication less effective.

The situation is complicated for smokers. More than half of chronic pain sufferers who seek pain management therapies smoke.

Tobacco use plays an active role in a wide variety of pain types, says pain management specialist Benjamin Abraham, MD.

In many cases, if you stop smoking, you can reverse the impact. In other cases, the damage is permanent.

The many pains of smoking

Tobacco use affects different areas of the body and the body’s systems in different ways.

Circulatory system: The nicotine in cigarettes and chewing tobacco decreases circulation, a condition also called peripheral artery disease (PAD).

The condition leads to atherosclerosis, a stiffening of the arterial walls that contributes to coronary artery disease. PAD also starves the heart muscle of needed oxygen and causes chest pain, called angina.

Lower back: Research shows that current and former smokers are 2.7 times more likely to have pain in the lower back than people who have never smoked. This link is strongest among adolescents, Dr. Abraham says.

Several factors contribute to the link between smoking and back pain:

  • Constricted blood vessels make it harder for necessary nutrients to reach the intervertebral discs responsible for spinal movement.
  • Decreased blood supply can cause degenerative lesions on these discs.
  • Smoking increases the risk for osteoporosis, which can cause fractures and deformities in the lower spine.

Joint pain: Smoking also contributes to joint pain linked to other conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Dr. Abraham says.

Recent studies label smoking as one of the biggest contributing environmental risk factors for developing RA.

Male smokers are twice as likely to develop RA, and female smokers are 1.27 times as likely as non-smokers. Smokers who have a genetic risk for RA are four times as likely to develop the condition.

Central nervous system: Smoking increases the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines floating in the blood stream.

Cytokines trigger the central nervous system, amplifying existing pain from the very first cigarette, Dr. Abraham says. Consequently, smokers require greater amounts of both over-the-counter and narcotic medications to control pain.

Menstrual cycle: According to a study in the British Medical Journal, women who begin smoking by age 15 are 50 percent more likely than non-smokers to have cramps that last two or more days during their period.

Tooth pain: Research shows smokers face a 30 percent increase in the risk of tooth pain. Researchers suspect the pain develops because tobacco reduces saliva and also leads to progressive tooth decay and poor wound healing.

Headache: Smokers are also 1.5 times more likely to get headaches than people who have never smoked.

Cluster headaches – severe headaches that last between 15 minutes and three hours – are common among smokers. Eighty percent to 90 percent of cluster headache sufferers have a significant history of smoking tobacco, Dr. Abraham says.

Can the painful damage be reversed?

The medical industry currently doesn’t know if there is any safe level of cigarette use, Dr. Abraham says. Much depends on gender, age and other contributing factors of disease, but some research suggests that as few as 10 cigarettes can induce an increase in general pain, slower healing, worse surgical outcomes, and more pain after surgery.

Tobacco-induced damage to structures linked to long-term pain, such as degenerative disc disease, does not heal on its own. However, in some areas, including the circulatory system, smoking cessation can reverse tobacco’s effect on pain, Dr. Abraham says.

Egyptian princess now known to be the first person in human history with diagnosed coronary artery disease.

The Egyptian princess Ahmose-Meryet-Amon, who lived in Thebes (Luxor) between 1580 and 1550 BC and who is now known to be first person in human history with diagnosed coronary artery disease, lived on a diet rich in vegetables, fruit and a limited amount of meat from domesticated (but not fattened) animals. Wheat and barley were grown along the banks of the Nile, making bread and beer the dietary staples of this period of ancient Egypt. Tobacco and trans-fats were unknown, and lifestyle was likely to have been active.

Both presentations were based on findings from the Horus study, in which arterial atherosclerosis was investigated in 52 ancient Egyptian mummies. Results have shown that recognisable arteries were present in 44 of the mummies, with an identifiable heart present in 16. Arterial calcification (as a marker of atherosclerosis) was evident at a variety of sites in almost half the mummies scanned, prompting the investigators to note that the condition was common in this group of middle aged or older ancient Egyptians; the 20 mummies with definite atherosclerosis were older (mean 45.years) than those with intact vascular tissue but no atherosclerosis (34.5 years).

Although relatively common at other vascular sites, atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries was evident in only three of the mummies investigated, but was clearly visualised in Princess Ahmose-Meryet-Amon (in whom calcification was present in every vascular bed visualised).

The CT scan image below shows that the princess, who died in her 40s, had atherosclerosis in two of her three main coronary arteries. “Today,” said Dr Gregory S Thomas, director of Nuclear Cardiology Education at the University of California, Irvine, USA, and co-principal investigator of the Horus study, “she would have needed by-pass surgery.”

CT scan shows atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries of Egyptian Mummy

Image: Calcification, seen as white, in the right (RCA) and left coronary arteries (LCA), each indicative of coronary artery disease.

“Overall, it was striking how much atherosclerosis we found,” said Dr Thomas. “We think of atherosclerosis as a disease of modern lifestyle, but it’s clear that it also existed 3500 years ago. Our findings certainly call into question the perception of atherosclerosis as a modern disease.”

If, however, the princess enjoyed a diet deemed to be healthy and pursued a lifestyle probably active, how could this “disease of modern life” affect her so visibly? Dr Thomas and his co-principal investigator Dr Adel Allam of Al Azhar University, Cairo, suggest three possibilities.

First, that there is still some unknown risk factor for cardiovascular disease, or at least a missing link in our understanding of it. Dr Allam noted a likely effect of genetic inheritance, pointing out that much of the human predisposition to atherosclerosis could be secondary to their genes. He similarly raised the possibility that an inflammatory response to the frequent parasitic infections common to ancient Egyptians might predispose to coronary disease – in much the same way that immunocompromised HIV cases seem also predisposed to early coronary disease. Nor can a dietary effect be excluded, despite what we know of life in ancient Egypt. Princess Ahmose-Meryet-Amon was from a noble family, her father, Seqenenre Tao II, the last pharaoh of the 17th Dynasty.

So it’s likely that her diet was not that of the common Egyptian. As a royal, she would have eaten more luxury foods – more meat, butter and cheese. Moreover, foods were preserved in salt, which may also have had an adverse effect.

Despite the suggestion of a genetic, inflammatory or unknown effect, Drs Thomas and Allam were keen not to discount those risk factors for heart disease which we do know about. Indeed, even in the study’s apparent association of atheroma with increasing age, there was a pattern of prevalence consistent with our own epidemiology today. “Recent studies have shown that by not smoking, having a lower blood pressure and a lower cholesterol level, calcification of our arteries is delayed,” said co-investigator Dr Randall C Thompson of the St Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute in Kansas City, USA. “On the other hand, from what we can tell from this study, humans are predisposed to atherosclerosis, so it behoves us to take the proper measures necessary to delay it as long as we can.”

Most of the Horus study research was performed at the National Museum of Antiquities in Cairo and would not have been possible without the availability of non-invasive CT scanning, the focus of the ICNC congress in Amsterdam. CT scanning and nuclear medicine imaging are the cornerstones of modern quantifiable cardiac disease detection, with safe and reproducible results.

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Cardiovascular Disease.


The role of inflammation in the propagation of atherosclerosis and susceptibility to cardiovascular (CV) events is well established. Of the wide array of inflammatory biomarkers that have been studied, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) has received the most attention for its use in screening and risk reclassification and as a predictor of clinical response to statin therapy. Although CRP is involved in the immunologic process that triggers vascular remodeling and plaque deposition and is associated with increased CV disease (CVD) risk, definitive randomized evidence for its role as a causative factor in atherothrombosis is lacking. Whether measurement of hsCRP levels provides consistent, clinically meaningful incremental predictive value in risk prediction and reclassification beyond conventional factors remains debated. Despite publication of guidelines on the use of hsCRP in CVD risk prediction by several leading professional organizations, there is a lack of clear consensus regarding the optimal clinical use of hsCRP. This article reviews 4 distinct points from the literature to better understand the current state and application of hsCRP in clinical practice: 1) the biology of hsCRP and its role in atherosclerosis; 2) the epidemiological association of hsCRP with CVD; 3) the quality of hsCRP as a biomarker of risk; and 4) the use of hsCRP as a tool to initiate or tailor statin therapy. Furthermore, we highlight recommendations from societies and important considerations when using hsCRP to guide treatment decisions in the primary prevention setting.

Source: Journal of the American College of Cardiology


Structural and biochemical characteristics of arterial stiffness in patients with atherosclerosis and in healthy subjects.

Arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality in patients with atherosclerosis. Angiographic score (ASc) reflects severity of atherosclerosis in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Osteopontin (OPN) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) are involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between arterial stiffness, ASc, serum OPN and oxLDL in patients with symptomatic PAD, and in clinically healthy subjects. We studied 79 men with symptomatic PAD (mean age 64±7 years) and 84 healthy men (mean age 63±8 years). Calculation of the ASc was based on severity and location of atherosclerotic lesions in the arteries of the lower extremities. Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) was evaluated by applanation tonometry using the Sphygmocor device. Serum OPN and oxLDL levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The aPWV (10±2.4 VS. 8.4±1.7 (m s−1); P<0.001), OPN (75 (62.3–85.8) VS. 54.8 (47.7–67.9) (ng ml−1); P<0.001) and oxLDL (67 (52.5–93.5) VS. 47.5 (37–65.5); P<0.001) were different for the patients and for the controls. In multiple regression models, aPWV was independently determined by ASc, log-OPN, log-oxLDL and estimated glomerular filtration rate in the patients (R2=0.44; P<0.001) and by log-OPN, log-oxLDL, age and heart rate in the controls (R2=0.38; P<0.001). The independent relationship of a PWV with serum levels of OPN and oxLDL in the patients with PAD and in the controls indicates that OPN and oxLDL might influence arterial stiffening in patients with atherosclerosis and in clinically healthy subjects.

Source: Hypertension Research/nature.

Stroke patients with cerebral microbleeds on MRI scans have arteriolosclerosis as well as systemic atherosclerosis.

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are recognized as a manifestation of arteriolosclerosis in cerebral small vessels. However, little is known regarding whether stroke patients with CMBs often have systemic atherosclerosis. The aim of the present study was to elucidate this issue using the cardio–ankle vascular index (CAVI), a new index of systemic atherosclerosis, in acute ischemic stroke patients. We prospectively studied 105 patients (71 males, median age=70.0 years) with acute ischemic stroke. All of the patients were examined using T2*-weighted gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to look for and assess the CMBs and using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery to evaluate white matter hyperintensity (WMH). We assigned the patients into CMB and non-CMB groups and compared the clinical characteristics of these groups. The factors associated with CMBs were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. T2*-weighted gradient echo MRI revealed CMBs in 47 patients (44.8%) and no CMBs in 58 patients (55.2%). The CAVI was significantly higher in the CMBs group (10.5 vs. 8.6, P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, CAVI per one point increase (odds ratio (OR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–2.00; P=0.006), advanced WMH (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.55–14.74; P=0.006) and impaired kidney function (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.16–9.81; P=0.031) were independent factors associated with the presence of CMBs. A high CAVI was independently associated with CMBs in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Our results indicated that ischemic stroke patients with CMBs may have cerebral arteriolosclerosis as well as systemic atherosclerosis.

Source: Hypertension Research/nature.

Erectile dysfunction: A sign of heart disease?

The same process that creates heart disease may also cause erectile dysfunction, only earlier.

Erectile dysfunction — difficulty maintaining an erection sufficient for sex — can be an early warning sign of heart problems. Understanding the connections between the two may help you get treatment before heart problems become serious. Likewise, if you have heart disease, getting the right treatment may help with erectile dysfunction.

Clogged arteries: Where erectile dysfunction and heart disease meet

Atherosclerosis (ath-ur-o-skluh-ROE-sis) — sometimes called hardening of the arteries — is the buildup of plaques in the arteries of your body. The smaller arteries in the body, such as in the penis, are the first to get plugged up. The plaque reduces blood flow in the penis, making an erection difficult. Erectile dysfunction is an alert to look for atherosclerosis in larger arteries supplying your heart and other organs and to take steps to treat it. Atherosclerosis also increases your risk of other problems, including aneurysm, stroke and peripheral artery disease.

Certain men are at increased risk

Besides sharing a common disease process, erectile dysfunction and heart disease also share many risk factors. These risk factors increase the likelihood that your erectile dysfunction could be a sign of underlying atherosclerosis and heart disease:

  • Having diabetes. Men who have diabetes are at especially high risk of erectile dysfunction, heart disease and other problems caused by restricted blood flow.
  • Having high cholesterol. A high level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL, or “bad”) cholesterol can lead to atherosclerosis.
  • Being a smoker. Smoking cigarettes raises your risk of developing atherosclerosis. It also directly affects your ability to get an erection.
  • Having high blood pressure. Over time, high blood pressure damages the lining of your arteries and accelerates the process of atherosclerosis.
  • Having a family member with heart disease. It’s more likely your erectile dysfunction could be linked to heart disease if you have a first-degree relative such as a sibling or parent who had heart disease at a young age.
  • Your age. The younger you are, the more likely that erectile dysfunction signals a risk of heart disease. Men younger than 50 are at especially high risk. In men older than 70, erectile dysfunction is much less likely to be a sign of heart disease.
  • Being overweight. Being overweight or obese increases your risk of both heart disease and erectile dysfunction due to atherosclerosis and other reasons.
  • Being depressed. There’s some evidence that depression is associated with an increased chance of having heart problems — and erectile dysfunction.

Treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by heart disease

If your doctor thinks you may be at risk of heart disease, making lifestyle changes such as exercising, changing your diet or losing weight may be enough to help keep your heart healthy — and improve your ability to have an erection. If you have more-serious signs and symptoms of heart disease, you may need further tests or treatment. If you have both erectile dysfunction and heart disease, talk to your doctor about treatment options for erectile dysfunction. If you take certain heart medications, especially nitrates, it is not safe to use many of the medications used to treat erectile dysfunction.

Source: Mayo Clinic.


Revised Guidelines: Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction in Patients with Atherosclerotic Disease.

New recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation and risk reduction are welcome, but updated guidance is lacking on lipid and blood pressure management.

Sponsoring Organizations: American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology

Background and Purpose: This revision updates the 2006 secondary prevention guidelines (JW Cardiol Jun 8 2006) and incorporates risk reduction into their title and purview. The guidelines continue to focus on important patient behaviors, including 30 minutes of physical activity daily, smoking cessation and avoidance of secondhand smoke, and weight management. However, the writing committee has deferred making major changes to the 2006 recommendations on blood pressure control and lipid management pending the revised versions of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute‘s Joint National Committee guidelines (JNC) and Adult Treatment Panel report (ATP), respectively (both expected in 2012).

Key Points:
1. A new section of Class I and Class IIa recommendations highlights the importance of referring patients for cardiac rehabilitation.

2. The guideline authors have reorganized the section on lipid management to emphasize evidence-based use of statins rather than the achievement of target lipid levels. Although no new specific recommendations have been added, the lack of evidence supporting non-statin lipid-lowering agents has demoted the use of combined drug therapies from Class I to either Class IIa or IIb, depending on the agent.

3. The authors have updated recommendations regarding antiplatelet therapy, incorporating new data on prasugrel from TRITON TIMI 38 and ticagrelor from PLATO (Class I).

4. The recommendations for beta-blocker therapy have been expanded and clarified, reflecting evidence that the drugs are most efficacious in patients with recent myocardial infarction, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or both.

5. The guidelines now identify and direct specific recommendations to populations at very high risk for poor outcomes.

6. A new section of Class IIa and Class IIb recommendations addresses screening for and management of depression.

Comment: The shift in focus toward risk reduction will help clinicians improve care for many patients, including older adults and those with depression. Although the guidelines are extensive and well written, the lack of new recommendations regarding the management of hyperlipidemia and hypertension decreases their immediate value. Virtually all patients with atherosclerotic disease have one or both of these conditions, and it is unfortunate that we must await the eighth edition of JNC and the fourth edition of ATP to inform current, evidence-based management decisions.

Source:Journal Watch Cardiology